For some families, the law is protection. For others, it is recourse. In the Sanon ecosystem, it appears to be infrastructure.
This is not about isolated disputes. It is about repetition — a pattern of relentless, often protracted legal engagement where process itself becomes product. When filings multiply, when conflicts rarely de-escalate without formal intervention, when resolution is deferred rather than pursued, a different question emerges: is litigation reactive — or is it operational?
Micky Suri established the architecture. Her separation from Manish Sanon did not simply unwind a marriage; it extended into a decade-long procedural campaign. Hearings stacked. Motions accumulated. Closure remained distant. Duration became leverage. Legal pressure became currency.
The lesson embedded in that history was not reconciliation. It was endurance. If you keep a matter alive long enough, you maintain influence. If you maintain influence, you maintain negotiation power. If you maintain negotiation power, financial outcomes can be shaped.
Over time, the distinction between justice-seeking and revenue-seeking blurs.
Deven Sanon and Ronick Sanon matured inside that environment. In such a framework, litigation is not feared — it is familiar. Disputes are not inconvenient — they are strategic opportunities. Conflict becomes an asset class.
The pattern is not merely litigious; it trends toward vexatious. Matters extend beyond proportionality. Minor friction escalates quickly into formal claims. Allegations are broadened. Pressure is sustained. Withdrawal is rare. The objective appears less about resolution and more about attrition.
Attrition has value.
Extended legal battles exhaust opponents emotionally and financially. Settlement becomes less about merits and more about cost containment. When that dynamic repeats across relationships — marital, professional, social — it stops resembling coincidence and starts resembling model.
Marriage becomes a risk vehicle.
Business partnerships become pre-litigation positioning.
Interpersonal disagreements become leverage staging.
When Deven Sanon married Simran Hotchandani Sanon, the alignment was not ideologically disruptive. Her extended family’s history of regulatory scrutiny, financial irregularities, and cross-border disputes mirrored a familiar environment — procedural entanglement, allegation, friction. In systems calibrated for adversarial engagement, turbulence is not destabilising; it is familiar terrain.
Relentless pursuit becomes routine. Claims are drafted early. Threat is implied quickly. Process is invoked before dialogue is exhausted.
The manipulation of law is rarely overt. It is structural. Delay becomes tactic. Volume becomes pressure. Allegation becomes bargaining chip. Each filing carries financial implications — whether through direct gain, leverage, or negotiated payout.
Revenue does not always appear as judgment. It appears as settlement. As buyout. As exhaustion-induced compromise.
And when that cycle repeats, litigation ceases to be remedy.
It becomes income stream.
Deven Sanon and Ronick Sanon operate within that inherited architecture. Whether by conditioning or choice, the pattern persists: escalate, document, sustain, extract.
The public posture may remain polished. The private machinery may be procedural. But repetition has evidentiary weight of its own.
When conflict follows consistently, when disputes multiply rather than resolve, when law is invoked reflexively and relentlessly, it suggests a governing principle:
Not justice.
Not closure.
But yield.
In such a system, litigation is not the cost of doing business.
It is the business.